The upcoming U.S. presidential election brings significant implications for income-focused investors, particularly as it could intersect with both political and economic strategies that directly impact bond markets. RBC Global Asset Management notes that, traditionally, the Federal Reserve plays a more central role in influencing the fixed-income market than political administrations. The Fed’s primary responsibilities—such as managing inflation and setting interest rates—tend to drive most bond market dynamics. This year, however, political factors, particularly trade policies, could play an unexpectedly pivotal role in shaping the fixed-income landscape.
According to Andrzej Skiba, head of BlueBay U.S. Fixed Income at RBC, trade policy might be a critical factor for income investors, especially if former President Donald Trump wins the election. Skiba points out that a Trump victory over Vice President Kamala Harris could lead to sweeping tariffs, with China likely in the crosshairs. If enacted, these tariffs would not only increase the cost of imports but could also have a broader inflationary impact across various sectors. This potential rise in inflation, in turn, might complicate the Fed’s plans to lower rates, a move many investors are currently anticipating. Therefore, while the Fed has been the main driver in fixed-income decisions, a Trump win could place political strategy, particularly trade, at the center of bond market considerations.
Trump’s proposed trade policies mark a shift from his previous term and include bold steps, such as a 60% tariff on Chinese goods and a 20% general tariff on imports from other countries. These tariffs, intended to pressure China and bolster U.S. manufacturing, represent a substantial increase from the policies enacted during Trump’s earlier presidency. While the goal of these tariffs is to strengthen the U.S. economy, they could also increase inflation. Skiba suggests that these tariffs might raise inflation by about 1%. While this increase might seem modest at first glance, even a small uptick could push the Fed to reconsider its rate-cutting plans. The Federal Reserve’s primary focus is to keep inflation stable, which influences its decisions on interest rates. Any sign of rising inflation can make the Fed reluctant to lower rates, as rate cuts could further stoke inflation.
For fixed-income investors, who rely on the bond market to generate income, inflation is a critical factor. When inflation rises, the purchasing power of bond interest payments decreases, making the returns less valuable in real terms. If the Fed is forced to maintain higher rates due to inflationary pressures from tariffs, it could make fixed-income investments less attractive, especially long-duration bonds. Long-duration bonds, which have extended maturity dates, are more vulnerable to interest rate changes. If interest rates remain high, these bonds could lose value, as investors might prefer newer bonds with better yields. Thus, a Trump administration’s trade policies could create a challenging environment for long-duration bonds.
Given the possible inflationary impact of a Trump win, Skiba suggests that fixed-income investors consider shifting their bond holdings towards short-duration assets, which are typically less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations. Short-duration bonds mature sooner, which means their returns are less affected by rising rates. Currently, many investors are choosing longer-duration bonds, expecting that the Fed will cut rates soon. This strategy relies on the assumption that rate cuts will raise bond prices and provide capital gains. However, if Trump’s trade policies are enacted and inflation rises, those expectations could be upended, leaving long-duration bondholders exposed to losses. In this scenario, short-term investments, such as cash and money markets, may offer a more stable option. Cash-based investments, although offering lower returns, are generally safer in an environment where rates are likely to remain high or even increase.
A Trump-led administration could also prompt a reallocation of funds from intermediate-term fixed-income investments towards more cash-based securities. As investors seek stability in cash holdings, there could be notable shifts in trading dynamics and bond valuations. This shift might not trigger a bond market downturn like the one seen in 2022, but it could still influence overall market performance. Skiba doesn’t foresee a steep drop; instead, he projects a “flat-ish” market performance over the coming year, with current yields helping to balance out some of the challenges posed by a high-rate environment. The current bond yields, which remain relatively strong, could provide some cushion and support stability, even if the market is relatively stagnant.
If, on the other hand, Vice President Kamala Harris secures the presidency, Skiba anticipates a more favorable environment for fixed-income assets. A Harris administration would likely align more closely with the Fed’s current rate-reduction trajectory, a plan designed to stimulate the economy in a slower-growth environment. In this scenario, long-duration bonds would become more attractive, as rate cuts tend to increase bond prices, providing capital gains for holders. Lower rates could make it easier for the government to support economic activity, benefiting both businesses and consumers.
In this rate-cutting environment, investors might be encouraged to hold longer-duration bonds, anticipating that their values will rise as rates decline. The significant liquidity in money markets, currently at $6.51 trillion, could also flow into bonds, attracted by the prospect of falling rates and a more stable economy. This influx of capital into bonds could help maintain a balanced bond market and potentially support further economic stability.
Despite these potential market shifts, Skiba advises income-focused investors to delay any major adjustments to their fixed-income portfolios until after the election results are finalized. For instance, if Trump wins, the initial market reaction may center on equities, offering a brief period for fixed-income investors to make portfolio adjustments before any tariff-driven inflation impacts bond markets. This interval could provide a strategic window for investors to reposition their portfolios without immediately facing the effects of increased inflation.
Skiba’s analysis underscores the complex interplay between political events and monetary policy in shaping the fixed-income market. Income-focused investors face both risks and opportunities, depending on the election outcome. A Trump administration, with its focus on trade tariffs, could lead to inflationary pressures that may limit the Fed’s ability to cut rates, thus supporting a more conservative, short-term investment approach. Conversely, a Harris administration could align with the Fed’s current plans for rate reductions, offering a more favorable climate for longer-duration bonds and potentially allowing for more growth-oriented strategies.
The 2024 election is shaping up to be a pivotal moment for fixed-income markets, with each candidate’s policies promising to impact bond investments differently. While Trump’s proposed tariffs could increase inflation and keep rates elevated, favoring a short-term bond approach, a Harris victory might encourage the Fed to continue rate cuts, benefiting longer-term bondholders. This dual possibility highlights the importance of flexibility and caution for income investors as they prepare for a market shaped by both monetary policy and political decision-making.
Comments