The Shift in China's Global Manufacturing Strategy
For decades, China leveraged foreign capital and technology to bolster its economic rise, encouraging Western firms to exchange technological expertise for market access. This strategy allowed China to cultivate competitive industries that often surpassed foreign counterparts in efficiency and affordability. However, the landscape is shifting, and it is now China grappling with the challenges of offshoring as its manufacturers increasingly move operations abroad.
In the year leading to June 2024, Chinese firms invested a staggering $177 billion in non-financial assets overseas, marking a record high. Notably, over 80% of this investment targeted "greenfield" projects, which involve building assets from the ground up, predominantly in emerging markets. This outflow is comparable to the wave of Japanese foreign direct investment (FDI) in the 1980s, which redefined global manufacturing and elevated Southeast Asian nations along the value chain. However, China's current investment patterns are stirring concerns both internationally and domestically.
Motivations for Offshoring
China's offshoring surge is influenced by a combination of external and internal factors. Tariffs imposed by the United States during Donald Trump’s presidency incentivized Chinese manufacturers to relocate production to circumvent trade barriers. Meanwhile, domestic conditions have become increasingly challenging. Rising labor costs and sluggish consumer demand have squeezed profit margins on low-value goods. Furthermore, the oversupply of manufacturing capacity, fueled by state-sponsored credit expansions, has triggered price wars, compelling companies to seek alternative markets.
Consequently, Chinese firms are channeling capital into factories in emerging economies, focusing on higher-value industries such as electric vehicles (EVs) and semiconductors. This contrasts with the 2014-2016 investment boom, during which Chinese companies pursued prestigious assets in developed nations, often as a means of safeguarding wealth. Today, the emphasis has shifted to strategically positioned emerging markets, with Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand becoming key destinations.
Benefits and Challenges in Host Countries
While China's FDI brings potential benefits such as infrastructure development and economic diversification, it also introduces significant challenges. Chinese firms often rely heavily on imported labor and materials, limiting opportunities for local workers and suppliers. For instance, in Germany, a substantial portion of the workforce at CATL’s battery plant comprises Chinese nationals. Similarly, Malaysia's attempts to enforce an 80:20 ratio of local to foreign workers have largely fallen short.
Moreover, China’s strict policies on technology transfer exacerbate tensions. The government has imposed restrictions on the export of sensitive technologies, requiring companies to obtain licenses for such transfers. As a result, many overseas operations function as "screwdriver" facilities, assembling Chinese-made components rather than fostering local supply chains. This dependency on Chinese imports is evident in the significant trade deficits of ASEAN countries with China, which reached $144 billion in the first ten months of 2024, a sharp increase from the previous year.
Impact on Local Industries
Chinese investments have disrupted local industries in host countries. The establishment of Chinese factories often translates to increased market share for Chinese firms at the expense of domestic competitors. For example, Chinese car manufacturers doubled their market share in Thailand to 11% in 2023, adversely affecting local suppliers and rivals. The closures of 2,000 production facilities in Thailand from 2022-2024 highlight the pressures local industries face, as exemplified by Suzuki’s exit from the market.
In response, host nations are beginning to push back. Malaysia plans to introduce a tax on firms based on their employment of foreign workers, starting in 2025. Additionally, ASEAN's upcoming free-trade agreement with China is expected to include provisions mandating technology sharing, reflecting growing demands for a more equitable exchange.
Domestic Concerns in China
The exodus of manufacturing firms has sparked apprehension within China about the potential "hollowing out" of its domestic industries. While some economists argue that relocating low-value production could free up resources for high-value manufacturing, local governments and policymakers are more cautious. Regions reliant on specific industries fear that offshoring could destabilize local economies and increase unemployment.
Efforts to retain industries have gained momentum. Cities like Jinjiang and Jiaxing have emphasized the irreplaceable advantages of their local supply chains, urging firms to reconsider relocating. State planners have also encouraged businesses to shift operations to less-developed regions within China, such as Yunnan and Chongqing, to sustain domestic manufacturing capabilities.
A Delicate Balancing Act
China’s policymakers face a dilemma. While curbing outbound investment could stabilize the domestic economy, it may also undermine efforts to bypass U.S. tariffs and maintain access to global markets. This delicate balance is evident in Xi Jinping’s emphasis on self-reliant supply chains and the government’s broader strategy to attract firms to China’s interior.
As geopolitical and economic pressures mount, Chinese firms may eventually adapt their overseas operations to align better with local expectations. Early signs of localization, such as adjustments to workplace practices in Germany, hint at potential progress. However, the Communist Party’s emphasis on domestic stability suggests that offshoring will remain a contentious issue.
In summary, the current wave of Chinese FDI reflects a complex interplay of global and domestic forces. While it presents opportunities for emerging markets, it also highlights challenges related to labor practices, technology transfer, and economic competition. For China, the stakes are equally high, as it navigates the risks of industrial relocation and its impact on long-term economic stability.
Comments